Introduction to Heating and Cooling Systems: Choosing the Right Solution for Your Home
Heating and cooling systems are essential for maintaining comfort year-round, but the best solution for your home depends on several factors, including climate, location, and the size of your house. From advanced geothermal technology to traditional furnaces, each system comes with its advantages and drawbacks. Here, we’ll explore the pros and cons of various heating and cooling systems—geothermal, mini-split systems, radiant heating, gas heating, furnaces & air conditioners, heat pumps, and combined heat and power—while considering how location and home size play a critical role in their efficiency and suitability.
1. Geothermal Heating and Cooling
- Pros: Geothermal systems use the earth’s stable underground temperatures to heat and cool your home, making them incredibly energy-efficient and environmentally friendly. These systems can reduce heating and cooling costs by up to 50%, last for decades, and offer consistent performance in any climate.
- Cons: The upfront installation cost is high due to the need for drilling and setting up underground loops. Not every location is suitable, and if space is limited or your property is difficult to excavate, this may not be the best option.
- Best For: Homes in climates with temperature extremes, particularly in larger properties where space is available for installation.
2. Mini-Split Systems
- Pros: Mini-split systems offer excellent flexibility, allowing you to heat or cool individual rooms without ductwork. They are highly energy-efficient and ideal for smaller homes or retrofitting older houses where ducts aren’t feasible.
- Cons: While efficient, mini-splits can have higher upfront costs for larger installations, and the indoor units may not be aesthetically pleasing.
- Best For: Small to medium-sized homes or properties with no existing ductwork, especially in mild climates.
3. Radiant Heating
- Pros: Radiant heating, often installed under floors, provides even and comfortable heat with minimal energy loss. It operates quietly and doesn’t circulate allergens, making it ideal for people with respiratory issues.
- Cons: This system is expensive to install, especially in existing homes where floors need to be lifted. Additionally, it doesn’t provide cooling, so a separate system is needed for summer months.
- Best For: Cold climates where consistent heating is needed, and in homes where air quality is a concern.
4. Gas Heating
- Pros: Gas heating is reliable, fast-acting, and generally more affordable to operate than electric systems. It works well in colder climates and can provide high levels of heat.
- Cons: Gas heating is dependent on access to natural gas, and it’s not as environmentally friendly due to CO2 emissions. There’s also a risk of gas leaks, which require careful monitoring.
- Best For: Homes in colder regions with access to natural gas and for those prioritizing quick and powerful heating.
5. Furnace & Air Conditioner (Split Systems)
- Pros: This is a common and proven system that provides separate heating and cooling functions. Furnaces can be powered by gas or electricity, and paired with a central air conditioner, the system can efficiently manage the home’s climate year-round.
- Cons: Installation and maintenance costs can be high, and ductwork is required. Also, traditional furnaces and air conditioners are not the most energy-efficient options available.
- Best For: Larger homes with existing ductwork, particularly in areas with distinct seasons requiring both heating and cooling.
6. Heat Pump Systems
- Pros: Heat pumps provide both heating and cooling in one unit by transferring heat in or out of the home. They are highly energy-efficient, especially in moderate climates, and can significantly reduce energy costs compared to traditional systems.
- Cons: Heat pumps are less effective in extremely cold climates where supplementary heating may be needed. The upfront cost is also higher than traditional systems.
- Best For: Homes in temperate climates where winters aren’t too harsh, and for those looking for an all-in-one, energy-efficient solution.
7. Combined Heat and Power (CHP)
- Pros: CHP systems generate electricity and heat simultaneously, making them highly efficient and reducing overall energy consumption. They are ideal for large buildings or homes that consume a lot of energy.
- Cons: The initial cost is high, and this system works best in larger buildings or homes with high energy demands. It is also location-dependent, as local energy policies and grid infrastructure can affect its feasibility.
- Best For: Large homes or properties where both electricity and heat needs are significant, particularly in areas with favorable energy policies.
How Location and Home Size Influence Your Choice
Your home’s location and size play a crucial role in determining the best heating and cooling system for you. For instance, homes in cold climates may benefit more from gas heating or a geothermal system, while heat pumps perform best in temperate areas. Additionally, the size of your home impacts both the system’s capacity and efficiency. Larger homes may require central systems with ductwork, while smaller homes might find mini-split systems or radiant heating more efficient and cost-effective.
Choosing the right system also depends on local energy availability, such as whether natural gas is accessible or if solar power is a viable option in your area. Climate conditions, energy costs, and your home’s specific needs should all factor into your decision to ensure you achieve the best balance of comfort, efficiency, and sustainability.
Types of Geothermal Heat Pump Systems
There are four basic types of GHP ground loop systems. Three of these—horizontal, vertical, and pond/lake—are closed-loop systems. The fourth type of system is the open-loop option. Several factors such as climate, soil conditions, available land, and local installation costs determine which is best for the site. All of these approaches can be used for residential and commercial building applications. An accredited contractor or installer can determine the best type of system to install in a particular location by testing the site’s soil and ground makeup and discussing the intended use.
Closed-Loop Systems
Most closed-loop geothermal heat pumps circulate water or a blended water-glycol solution through a closed loop—usually made of a high-density plastic-type tubing—that is buried in the ground or submerged in water. A heat exchanger transfers heat between the refrigerant in the heat pump and the antifreeze solution in the closed loop.
One type of closed-loop system, called direct exchange, does not use a heat exchanger and instead pumps the refrigerant through copper tubing that is buried in the ground in a horizontal or vertical configuration.
Horizontal
This type of installation is generally most cost-effective for residential installations, particularly for new construction where sufficient land is available. It requires trenches at least four feet deep. The most common layouts either use two pipes, one buried at six feet, and the other at four feet, or two pipes placed side-by-side at five feet in the ground in a two-foot wide trench. The Slinky™ method of looping pipe allows more pipe in a shorter trench, which cuts down on installation costs and makes horizontal installation possible in areas it would not be with conventional horizontal applications.
Vertical
Large commercial buildings and schools often use vertical systems because the land area required for horizontal loops would be prohibitive. Vertical loops are also used where the soil is too shallow for trenching, and they minimize the disturbance to existing landscaping. For a vertical system, holes (approximately four inches in diameter) are drilled about 20 feet apart and 100 to 400 feet deep. Two pipes, connected at the bottom with a U-bend to form a loop, are inserted into the hole and grouted to improve performance. The vertical loops are connected with horizontal pipe (i.e., manifold), placed in trenches, and connected to the heat pump in the building.
This type of heating/cooling system is ideal for saving money in the long term, however not everyone has the space especially if you live In small lots.
Ductless Mini Split Heat Pumps
- Energy Saver
- Home Comfort
- Heat Pump Systems
- Ductless Minisplit Heat Pumps
Ductless minisplit heat pumps (also called “minisplits”) are an excellent option for retrofitting houses with non-ducted heating systems like hydronic (hot water heat), radiant panels, and space heaters (wood, kerosene, propane). They are also ideal for room additions where extending or installing distribution ductwork is not feasible and for very efficient new homes that require only a small space conditioning system. For maximum energy savings, choose an ENERGY STAR®certified unit and hire an experienced installer.
How Ductless Minisplit Heat Pumps Work
Like standard air-source heat pumps, minisplits have two main components: an outdoor compressor/condenser and an indoor air-handling unit. These components are linked by a conduit that houses the power cable, refrigerant tubing, suction tubing, and a condensate drain.
Advantages of Ductless Minisplit Heat Pumps
- Small Size and Flexibility: Minisplits are compact and offer flexibility for zoning or heating and cooling individual rooms. Many models support up to four indoor air-handling units connected to one outdoor unit, allowing conditioning for four separate zones or rooms. Each zone has its own thermostat, providing flexibility to condition only occupied spaces, saving energy and money.
- Ease of Installation: Installing minisplits is simpler than many other space conditioning systems. The connection between the outdoor and indoor units generally requires only a three-inch hole through a wall for the conduit. The outdoor unit can be located up to 50 feet away from the indoor evaporator, allowing for placement in a less visible or more advantageous location.
- Energy Efficiency: Minisplits have no ducts, avoiding the energy losses associated with the ductwork of central forced air systems. Duct losses can account for more than 30% of energy consumption for space conditioning, especially if ducts are in an unconditioned space like an attic. Ducted heat pumps typically achieve efficiency ratings between 15.2 to 25 SEER2, while ductless minisplits can achieve ratings between 15.2 and 35 SEER2.
- Interior Design Flexibility: Minisplits offer more interior design options. Indoor air handlers can be suspended from the ceiling, mounted flush into a drop ceiling, or hung on a wall. Floor-standing models are also available. Most indoor units are about seven inches deep and have sleek, high-tech-looking jackets. Many units also come with a remote control for easy operation.
Disadvantages of Ductless Minisplit Heat Pumps
- Higher Installation Costs: Installing minisplits can be more expensive than some other systems, though lower operating costs and available rebates or financial incentives can help offset the initial expense. Explore incentives in your area using the ENERGY STAR Home Improvement Savings tool.
- Sizing and Placement Challenges: Proper sizing and location of each indoor unit are crucial. Oversized or incorrectly placed air handlers can result in short cycling, wasting energy and failing to provide proper temperature or humidity control. An oversized system is more expensive to buy and operate.
- Aesthetic Concerns: Some people may not like the appearance of the indoor units. While less obtrusive than window room air conditioners, these units do not have the built-in look of central systems. Additionally, there must be a place to drain condensate water outdoors.
Hydronic Floor Heating
RADIANT FLOOR HEAT
There are three types of radiant floor heat — radiant air floors (air is the heat-carrying medium), electric radiant floors, and hot water (hydronic)
radiant floors. You can further categorize these types by installation. Those that make use of the large thermal mass of a concrete slab floor or lightweight concrete over a wooden subfloor are called “wet installations,” and those in which the installer “sandwiches” the radiant floor tubing between two layers of plywood or attaches the tubing under the finished floor or subfloor are called “dry installations.”
Types of Radiant Floor Heat
AIR-HEATED RADIANT FLOORS
Air cannot hold large amounts of heat, so radiant air floors are not cost-effective in residential applications, and are seldom installed. Although they can be combined with solar air heating systems, those systems suffer from the obvious drawback of only producing heat in the daytime, when heating loads are generally lower. The inefficiency of trying to heat a home with a conventional furnace by pumping air through the floors at night outweighs the benefits of using solar heat during the day. Although some early solar air heating systems used rocks as a heat-storage medium, this approach is not recommended (see solar air heating systems).
ELECTRIC RADIANT FLOORS
Electric radiant floors typically consist of electric heating cables built into the floor. Systems that feature electrical matting mounted on the subfloor below a floor covering such as tile are also available.
Because of the relatively high cost of electricity, electric radiant floors are usually only cost-effective if they include a significant thermal mass such as a thick concrete floor and your electric utility company offers time-of-use rates. Time-of-use rates allow you to “charge” the concrete floor with heat during off-peak hours (approximately 9 p.m. to 6 a.m.). If the floor’s thermal mass is large enough, the heat stored in it will keep the house comfortable for eight to ten hours without any further electrical input, particularly when daytime temperatures are significantly warmer than nighttime temperatures. This saves a considerable amount of money compared to heating at peak electric rates during the day.
Electric radiant floors may also make sense for home additions if it would be impractical to extend the heating system into the new space. However, homeowners should examine other options, such as mini-split heat pumps, which operate more efficiently and have the added advantage of providing cooling.
HYDRONIC RADIANT FLOORS
Hydronic (liquid) systems are the most popular and cost-effective radiant heating systems for heating-dominated climates. Hydronic radiant floor systems pump heated water from a boiler through tubing laid in a pattern under the floor. In some systems, controlling the flow of hot water through each tubing loop by using zoning valves or pumps and thermostats regulates room temperatures. The cost of installing a hydronic radiant floor varies by location and depends on the size of the home, the type of installation, the floor covering, remoteness of the site, and the cost of labor.
TYPES OF FLOOR INSTALLATIONS
Whether you use heating cables or tubing, the methods of installing electric and hydronic radiant systems in floors are similar.
So-called “wet” installations embed the cables or tubing in a solid floor and are the oldest form of modern radiant floor systems. The tubing or cable can be embedded in a thick concrete foundation slab (commonly used in “slab” ranch houses that don’t have basements) or in a thin layer of concrete, gypsum, or other material installed on top of a subfloor. If concrete is used and the new floor is not on solid earth, additional floor support may be necessary because of the added weight. You should consult a professional engineer to determine the floor’s carrying capacity.
Thick concrete slabs are ideal for storing heat from solar energy systems, which have a fluctuating heat output. The downside of thick slabs is their slow thermal response time, which makes strategies such as night or daytime setbacks difficult if not impossible. Most experts recommend maintaining a constant temperature in homes with these types of heating systems.
Due to recent innovations in floor technology, so-called “dry” floors, in which the cables or tubing run in an air space beneath the floor, have been gaining in popularity, mainly because a dry floor is faster and less expensive to build. Because dry floors involve heating an air space, the radiant heating system needs to operate at a higher temperature.
Some dry installations involve suspending the tubing or cables under the subfloor between the joists. This method usually requires drilling through the floor joists to install the tubing. Reflective insulation must also be installed under the tubes to direct the heat upward. Tubing or cables may also be installed from above the floor, between two layers of subfloor. In these instances, liquid tubing is often fitted into aluminum diffusers that spread the water’s heat across the floor in order to heat the floor more evenly. The tubing and heat diffusers are secured between furring strips, which carry the weight of the new subfloor and finished floor surface.
At least one company has improved on this idea by making a plywood subfloor material manufactured with tubing grooves and aluminum heat diffuser plates built into them. Such products also allow for the use of half as much tubing or cabling, because the heat transfer of the floor is greatly improved compared with more traditional dry or wet floors.
FLOOR COVERINGS
Ceramic tile is the most common and effective floor covering for radiant floor heating, because it conducts heat well and adds thermal storage. Common floor coverings like vinyl and linoleum sheet goods, carpeting, or wood can also be used, but any covering that insulates the floor from the room will decrease the efficiency of the system.
If you want carpeting, use a thin carpet with dense padding and install as little carpeting as possible. If some rooms, but not all, have a floor covering, then those rooms should have a separate tubing loop to make the system heat these spaces more efficiently. This is because the water flowing under the covered floor will need to be hotter to compensate for the floor covering. Wood flooring should be laminated wood flooring instead of solid wood to reduce the possibility of the wood shrinking and cracking from the drying effects of the heat.
RADIANT PANELS
Wall- and ceiling-mounted radiant panels are usually made of aluminum and can be heated with either electricity or with tubing that carries hot water, although the latter creates concerns about leakage in wall- or ceiling-mounted systems. Most commercially available radiant panels for homes are electrically heated.
Image
Like any type of electric heat, radiant panels can be expensive to operate, but they can provide supplemental heating in some rooms or can provide heat to a home addition when extending the conventional heating system is impractical.
Radiant panels have the quickest response time of any heating technology and — because the panels can be individually controlled for each room—the quick response feature can result in cost and energy savings compared with other systems when rooms are infrequently occupied. When entering a room, the occupant can increase the temperature setting and be comfortable within minutes. As with any heating system, set the thermostat to a minimum temperature that will prevent pipes from freezing.
Radiant heating panels operate on a line-of-sight basis — you’ll be most comfortable if you’re close to the panel. Some people find ceiling-mounted systems uncomfortable because the panels heat the top of their heads and shoulders more effectively than the rest of their bodies.